Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Castello, Jorge Pablo
dc.contributor.author Sunyé, Patricia Sfair
dc.contributor.author Haimovici, Manuel
dc.contributor.author Silva, Denis Hellebrandt da
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-16T15:02:16Z
dc.date.available 2012-08-16T15:02:16Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation CASTELLO, Jorge Pablo et al. Fisheries in southern Brazil: a comparison of their management and sustainability. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, v. 25, p. 287-293, 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.demersais.furg.br/Files/2009.Castello.Fisheries.South.Brazil.J.Appl.Ichthyol.pdf>. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2012. pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn 0175–8659
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/2375
dc.description.abstract Defined as operational units, the estuarine and marine fishing production systems (FPS) from the two southernmost states of Brazil, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul were analyzed using the RAPFISH technique with respect to sustainability of fisheries. The FPS were defined by 49 attributes divided into five fields: economic, social, ecological, technological and managerial. Data were obtained from the literature and interviews with fishers, skippers, and ship owners in 2003 and 2004. Overall, 26 FPS were identified: nine small-scale; three medium-scale; ten large-scale operating on the shelf, upper slope or nearby oceanic waters; and four large-scale fishing systems on the upper slope or neighboring oceanic waters. The latter included only foreign vessels, which produced frozen products exclusively for export. Analyses of 15 selected attributes more closely associated with sustainability in the five fields of evaluation showed all FPS in an intermediate position between the extremes of ideal and bad, reinforcing the perception that no FPS in southern Brazil can be considered truly sustainable; evidence of clearly unsustainable FPS was also not found. Thus RAPFISH fell short of producing a clear pattern that could result in sound management, probably due to disagreement among the different dimensions of sustainability. All five fields of evaluation were equally weighted; however, it could be argued that the biological and ecological status of fisheries were not given enough emphasis in relation to the other dimensions. Dissimilarities within FPS and differences regarding sustainability levels must all be taken into consideration for sound management measures. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.rights open access pt_BR
dc.title Fisheries in southern Brazil: a comparison of their management and sustainability pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01229.x pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

:

  • IO - Artigos publicados em periódicos
  • Show simple item record