dc.contributor.author |
Dotto, Tiago Segabinazzi |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Pereira, Rodrigo Kerr Duarte |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mata, Mauricio Magalhães |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Azeneu, Marina do Valle Chagas |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Wainer, Ilana Elazari Klein Coaracy |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fahrbach, Eberhard |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rohardt, Gerd |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-01-25T12:34:09Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-01-25T12:34:09Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2014 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
DOTTO, Tiago Segabinazzi et al. Assessment of the structure and variability of Weddell Sea water masses in distinct ocean reanalysis products. Ocean Science, v.10, n.3, p.523-546, 2014 Disponível em: <http://www.ocean-sci.net/10/523/2014/os-10-523-2014.html>. Acesso em 22 Jan 2016. |
pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn |
2005-7172 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/5881 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
We assessed and evaluated the performance of
five ocean reanalysis products in reproducing essential hydrographic
properties and their associated temporal variability
for the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. The products used in
this assessment were ECMWF ORAS4 (European Centre for
Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Ocean Reanalysis System
4), CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), MyOcean
UR025.4 (University of Reading), ECCO2 (Estimating
the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean, Phase II) and
SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation). The present study
focuses on the Weddell Sea deep layer, which is composed
of the following three main water masses: Warm Deep Water
(WDW), Weddell Sea Deep Water (WSDW) and Weddell
Sea Bottom Water (WSBW). The MyOcean UR025.4 product
provided the most accurate representation of the structure
and thermohaline properties of the Weddell Sea water masses
when compared with observations. All the ocean reanalysis
products analyzed exhibited limited capabilities in representing
the surface water masses in the Weddell Sea. The CFSR
and ECCO2 products were not able to represent deep water
masses with a neutral density ≥ 28.40 kg m−3
, which was
considered the WSBW’s upper limit throughout the simulation
period. The expected WDW warming was only reproduced
by the SODA product, whereas the ECCO2 product
was able to represent the trends in the WSDW’s hydrographic
properties. All the assessed ocean reanalyses were able to
represent the decrease in the WSBW’s density, except the
SODA product in the inner Weddell Sea. Improvements in
parameterization may have as much impact on the reanalyses
assessed as improvements in horizontal resolution primarily
because the Southern Ocean lacks in situ data, and the data
that are currently available are summer-biased. The choice of
the reanalysis product should be made carefully, taking into
account the performance, the parameters of interest, and the
type of physical processes to be evaluated. |
pt_BR |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
pt_BR |
dc.rights |
open access |
pt_BR |
dc.title |
Assessment of the structure and variability of weddell sea water masses in distinct ocean reanalysis products |
pt_BR |
dc.type |
article |
pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.5194/os-10-523-2014 |
pt_BR |