Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dotto, Tiago Segabinazzi
dc.contributor.author Pereira, Rodrigo Kerr Duarte
dc.contributor.author Mata, Mauricio Magalhães
dc.contributor.author Azeneu, Marina do Valle Chagas
dc.contributor.author Wainer, Ilana Elazari Klein Coaracy
dc.contributor.author Fahrbach, Eberhard
dc.contributor.author Rohardt, Gerd
dc.date.accessioned 2016-01-25T12:34:09Z
dc.date.available 2016-01-25T12:34:09Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation DOTTO, Tiago Segabinazzi et al. Assessment of the structure and variability of Weddell Sea water masses in distinct ocean reanalysis products. Ocean Science, v.10, n.3, p.523-546, 2014 Disponível em: <http://www.ocean-sci.net/10/523/2014/os-10-523-2014.html>. Acesso em 22 Jan 2016. pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn 2005-7172
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/5881
dc.description.abstract We assessed and evaluated the performance of five ocean reanalysis products in reproducing essential hydrographic properties and their associated temporal variability for the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. The products used in this assessment were ECMWF ORAS4 (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Ocean Reanalysis System 4), CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis), MyOcean UR025.4 (University of Reading), ECCO2 (Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean, Phase II) and SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation). The present study focuses on the Weddell Sea deep layer, which is composed of the following three main water masses: Warm Deep Water (WDW), Weddell Sea Deep Water (WSDW) and Weddell Sea Bottom Water (WSBW). The MyOcean UR025.4 product provided the most accurate representation of the structure and thermohaline properties of the Weddell Sea water masses when compared with observations. All the ocean reanalysis products analyzed exhibited limited capabilities in representing the surface water masses in the Weddell Sea. The CFSR and ECCO2 products were not able to represent deep water masses with a neutral density ≥ 28.40 kg m−3 , which was considered the WSBW’s upper limit throughout the simulation period. The expected WDW warming was only reproduced by the SODA product, whereas the ECCO2 product was able to represent the trends in the WSDW’s hydrographic properties. All the assessed ocean reanalyses were able to represent the decrease in the WSBW’s density, except the SODA product in the inner Weddell Sea. Improvements in parameterization may have as much impact on the reanalyses assessed as improvements in horizontal resolution primarily because the Southern Ocean lacks in situ data, and the data that are currently available are summer-biased. The choice of the reanalysis product should be made carefully, taking into account the performance, the parameters of interest, and the type of physical processes to be evaluated. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.rights open access pt_BR
dc.title Assessment of the structure and variability of weddell sea water masses in distinct ocean reanalysis products pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi 10.5194/os-10-523-2014 pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

:

  • IO - Artigos publicados em periódicos
  • Show simple item record