dc.contributor.author |
Mattos, Gabriela Torres |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Santos, Paula Costa dos |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Telmo, Paula de Lima |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Berne, Maria Elisabeth Aires |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Scaini, Carlos James |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-03-20T18:41:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-03-20T18:41:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
MATTOS, Gabriela Torres et al. Human Toxocariasis: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Biosafety in Research Laboratories. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v. 95, n.6, p. 1428-1431, 2016. Disponível em:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311927991_Human_toxocariasis_Prevalence_and_factors_associated_with_biosafety_in_research_laboratories>. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2017. |
pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn |
0002-9637 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/7106 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Human toxocariasis is a neglected parasitic disease worldwide. Researchers studying this disease use
infectious strains of Toxocara for experiments. Health workers are at risk in the course of their daily routine and must
adhere to biosafety standards while carrying out the activities. Researchers on biosafety concerning working with these
parasites are insufficient. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of seroprevalence of Toxocara species among
health-care research laboratory workers (professors, technicians, and students), and to investigate the risk factors
of Toxocara infection associated with laboratory practices. This cross-sectional study involved 74 researchers at two
federal universities in southern Brazil from February 2014 to February 2015; 29 researchers manipulated infective
strains of Toxocara canis (test group) and 45 did not (control group). Serum samples were examined using enzymelinked
immunosorbent assay. Epidemiological data were obtained via a questionnaire containing information about
laboratory routine, eating behavior, and contact with dogs. The seroprevalence of anti-T. canis IgG was 14.9% (11/74;
13.8% [4/29] in the test group and 15.6% [7/45] in the control group). Most individuals in the test group correctly
understood the primary mode of infection; however, 13.8% did not use gloves while manipulating T. canis eggs. Knowledge
of biosafety must be well understood by health-care professionals doing laboratory work with biological agents.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the rate of seroprevalence of IgG against Toxocara spp. among
professionals and students who handle infective forms of the nematode T. canis. |
pt_BR |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
pt_BR |
dc.rights |
open access |
pt_BR |
dc.title |
Human toxocariasis: Prevalence and factors associated with biosafety in research laboratories |
pt_BR |
dc.type |
article |
pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi |
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0196 |
pt_BR |