Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mattos, Gabriela Torres
dc.contributor.author Santos, Paula Costa dos
dc.contributor.author Telmo, Paula de Lima
dc.contributor.author Berne, Maria Elisabeth Aires
dc.contributor.author Scaini, Carlos James
dc.date.accessioned 2017-03-20T18:41:33Z
dc.date.available 2017-03-20T18:41:33Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation MATTOS, Gabriela Torres et al. Human Toxocariasis: Prevalence and Factors Associated with Biosafety in Research Laboratories. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v. 95, n.6, p. 1428-1431, 2016. Disponível em:<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311927991_Human_toxocariasis_Prevalence_and_factors_associated_with_biosafety_in_research_laboratories>. Acesso em: 17 mar. 2017. pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn 0002-9637
dc.identifier.uri http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/7106
dc.description.abstract Human toxocariasis is a neglected parasitic disease worldwide. Researchers studying this disease use infectious strains of Toxocara for experiments. Health workers are at risk in the course of their daily routine and must adhere to biosafety standards while carrying out the activities. Researchers on biosafety concerning working with these parasites are insufficient. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of seroprevalence of Toxocara species among health-care research laboratory workers (professors, technicians, and students), and to investigate the risk factors of Toxocara infection associated with laboratory practices. This cross-sectional study involved 74 researchers at two federal universities in southern Brazil from February 2014 to February 2015; 29 researchers manipulated infective strains of Toxocara canis (test group) and 45 did not (control group). Serum samples were examined using enzymelinked immunosorbent assay. Epidemiological data were obtained via a questionnaire containing information about laboratory routine, eating behavior, and contact with dogs. The seroprevalence of anti-T. canis IgG was 14.9% (11/74; 13.8% [4/29] in the test group and 15.6% [7/45] in the control group). Most individuals in the test group correctly understood the primary mode of infection; however, 13.8% did not use gloves while manipulating T. canis eggs. Knowledge of biosafety must be well understood by health-care professionals doing laboratory work with biological agents. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the rate of seroprevalence of IgG against Toxocara spp. among professionals and students who handle infective forms of the nematode T. canis. pt_BR
dc.language.iso eng pt_BR
dc.rights open access pt_BR
dc.title Human toxocariasis: Prevalence and factors associated with biosafety in research laboratories pt_BR
dc.type article pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0196 pt_BR


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

:

  • FAMED – Artigos publicados em periódicos
  • Show simple item record