dc.contributor.author |
Chalhub, Daniel José Nahid Mansur |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sphaier, Leandro Alcofarado |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-05-25T20:07:27Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2017-05-25T20:07:27Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
CHALHUB, Daniel José Nahid Mansur; SPHAIER, Leandro Alcofarado. Vetor, v. 20, n. 1, p. 5-22, 2010. Disponível em: <https://www.seer.furg.br/vetor/article/view/1740>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2016. |
pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn |
0102-7352 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repositorio.furg.br/handle/1/7186 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The current work provides a comparison between two different methodologies for
solving convection-diffusion problems: the Generalized Integral Transform Technique
(GITT) and the Finite Volumes Method (FVM). The problem of thermally developing
laminar flow of non-Newtonian fluids between parallel plates is selected for illustrating
purposes. Both solutions focus on the transformation of a partial-differential formulation
into an ordinary-differential form, either through integral transformation or
discretization of the directional variable transversal to the flow. The resulting ODE
systems are solved analytically and comparison results are presented, indicating advantages
and disadvantages of each methodology. Once comparisons are performed
advantages and disadvantages of each methodology are discussed. The results indicate
that, in general, the integral transform technique presents a better convergence
rate. |
pt_BR |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
pt_BR |
dc.publisher |
EDGRAF |
pt_BR |
dc.rights |
open access |
pt_BR |
dc.subject |
Integral transform |
pt_BR |
dc.subject |
Finite volumes |
pt_BR |
dc.subject |
Non-Newtonian fluid |
pt_BR |
dc.subject |
Parallel plates |
pt_BR |
dc.title |
Analysis of finite volumes and integral transform solutions for thermally developing non-Newtonian fluid flow |
pt_BR |
dc.type |
article |
pt_BR |